Home›Standards›GSTC-FB

FB
New · July 2026

GSTC Food & Beverage Standard

v1.0 · 36 criteria · 215 performance indicators · Restaurants, cafés, catering services, food halls

Published 6 July 2026 with support from the Türkiye Tourism Promotion and Development Agency, this is the newest of GSTC's six standards. GSTC developed it for food and beverage service providers in the tourism sector, and describes it as “the minimum that any food and beverage service provider should aspire to reach”. 36 criteria carrying 215 performance indicators — from a food safety baseline to food traditions, used cooking oil and a 30% plant-based menu threshold.

Certification against GSTC-FB is not yet available

This is worth stating plainly before anything else on this page, because it is the first thing a food business needs to know and it is easy to assume otherwise. Two things establish it. GSTC accredits Certification Bodies against a defined list of tourism activities — hotels and accommodation, tour operators, tour products, the three MICE scopes, and attractions — and food and beverage is not on that list, so no CB can currently be accredited to certify against this standard. And GSTC’s own page for GSTC-FB, unlike its pages for the other standards, does not list certification among the standard’s uses — it lists education, training, guidance and a common reference.

So nobody can sell you GSTC-FB certification today, and you should be sceptical of anyone who offers to. If that changes, it will show up as an added scope in the Accreditation Manual; ask GSTC or a CB directly rather than taking our word for the current position.

What it is useful for now is the thing GSTC itself points at: a structured, credible reference for improving how a food business actually runs, and a way to know where you stand before anyone is auditing. A standard this new also means the work you do now is ahead of the market rather than catching up with it.

Sources: Accreditation Manual v5.0, clause 5.1.1·GSTC Food & Beverage Standard

Cluster 1

Is this for me?

Who GSTC-FB applies to

What is GSTC-FB?

The GSTC Food and Beverage Standard, published 6 July 2026 — the newest of GSTC's six standards, developed with support from the Türkiye Tourism Promotion and Development Agency. It follows the same four-pillar structure as the other GSTC standards and, in its own words, was “developed specifically for food and beverage service providers, including restaurants, cafés, catering services, food halls, and similar operations”. 36 criteria, 215 performance indicators, each supported by guidance in an Annex. Note that it is a reference and improvement standard today rather than a certification scheme — see the notice above.

Source:GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Preamble·GSTC Food & Beverage Standard

Who does it apply to?

The standard names “restaurants, cafés, catering services, food halls, and similar operations”, and its guidance plainly contemplates a wide range of formats — single-dish concepts, fixed degustation menus, street food vendors and very small operations all get their own treatment under the menu criterion.

⚠️ One boundary to note, because the two GSTC sources differ slightly in emphasis: the standard’s own preamble says “food and beverage service providers” without qualification, while GSTC’s website scopes it to providers in the tourism sector. If you are a food business with no tourism connection at all, the criteria will still be useful to you, but do not assume GSTC considers you in scope. We have not seen GSTC address institutional catering such as school or hospital canteens either way.

Source:GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Preamble, and the Annex: Guidelines for A10·GSTC Food & Beverage Standard

Does it apply to a small independent restaurant or café?

Yes, and the standard is unusually explicit about it. Its Standard Application clause recommends that all criteria be applied “to the greatest extent possible”, requires a justification where a criterion is not applicable because of local regulatory, environmental, social, economic or cultural conditions, and states that “for micro and community-owned tourism businesses with a limited footprint, limited resources may prevent the comprehensive application of all criteria”. A1 separately requires the policy and targets to be proportionate to the organisation’s size, staff capacity and activities. So scale is recognised — through justified non-applicability, not through a lighter tier.

Source:GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Standard Application, and Criterion A1

My hotel is GSTC-H certified. Does that cover our restaurant?

Your hotel certification already reaches the kitchen to a degree: GSTC-H has its own criterion A14 Food and Beverages, and the Accreditation Manual’s definition of a hotel expressly contemplates food and beverage among the services it may provide. What GSTC-FB adds is depth — a food safety baseline, a menu criterion with nine indicators, liquid waste and used cooking oil, food traditions — in places where GSTC-H is necessarily brief. Since F&B certification does not exist as a separate scope, the practical use of GSTC-FB for a hotel restaurant today is as a working reference for the part of GSTC-H it overlaps, and as preparation. Ask your CB what your existing assessment covered.

GSTC publishes no answer to this. TavaSIS’s own reading, based onAccreditation Manual v5.0, Clauses 5.1.1 and the definition of “Hotel”·GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criteria A2, A10, D6, C2

Cluster 2

Why work to it now?

What a standard you cannot yet certify against is actually good for

If I cannot be certified, what is the point of working to it?

→
Your buyers ask before GSTC does: Hotel groups, event caterers and institutional food service increasingly ask suppliers what their sustainability practice actually is. A structured answer against a published global standard is a better answer than a page of adjectives, whether or not anyone has audited it.
→
It is a working operations checklist: Most of what this standard asks for is not paperwork for its own sake: grease traps maintained, used cooking oil going to an authorised vendor with records, food waste measured by stream, allergen information on the menu, annual food safety training. A food business that cannot show these has operational exposure quite apart from sustainability.
→
Being early is worth something: The standard is months old. Doing the work now means you are ahead of it rather than reacting to it, and if an F&B scope of accreditation is added later you will not be starting from nothing.

GSTC publishes no answer to this. TavaSIS’s own reading, based onGSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criteria A2, D6, D7, A10

My restaurant already sources locally and reduces food waste. Why formalise it?

Because undocumented practice is invisible to everyone except you, and because writing it down is what reveals the gaps — a supplier you assume is fine whose practices nobody has checked, a waste stream not yet measured, an allergen risk on the menu. D1 asks for a written responsible-sourcing policy and annual targets to improve supplier compliance; D7 covers solid and food waste across eleven indicators. Neither is satisfied by doing the right thing informally.

Source:GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criteria D1 and D7

What does EU Directive 2024/825 mean for a food business?

Member States had to adopt the measures by 27 March 2026 and apply them from 27 September 2026. Two provisions matter to a menu, a website or a packaging claim, and both are narrower than “you now need certification”: displaying a sustainability label not founded on a certification scheme monitored by an independent third party is prohibited, and generic environmental claims — ‘eco-friendly’, ‘environmentally friendly’ — are prohibited unless recognised excellent environmental performance is demonstrated.

So a specific, substantiated claim can still stand on its own evidence. What the directive closes off is vague claims and self-awarded labels — which is exactly the shape of most restaurant sustainability messaging.

⚠️ GSTC-FB is not a route to a label here, because there is no certification to hold. Where it does help is the substance: A7 requires promotion and information to be accurate, and working through the criteria gives you evidence behind specific claims rather than adjectives. If EU consumers matter to your business, this is a question for your own legal advice, not for us.

Source:Directive (EU) 2024/825 (EUR-Lex)·GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criterion A7

Cluster 3

What does GSTC-FB cover?

Four sections, 36 criteria, 215 indicators — 63 / 50 / 9 / 93

What are the four sections and what does each assess?

→
Section A — Demonstrate effective sustainable management (A1–A11, 63 indicators): The management system (A1), food safety as a baseline requirement (A2), legal compliance (A3), reporting (A4), employee engagement (A5), service quality and guest experience (A6), accurate promotion and information (A7), buildings and infrastructure (A8), sustainable practices and materials (A9), the menu (A10, nine indicators and the 30% plant-based threshold), and land, water and property rights (A11).
→
Section B — Maximizing social and economic benefits (B1–B9, 50 indicators): Local community development (B1), local employment (B2), local and inclusive procurement (B3), supporting local entrepreneurs (B4), community services and livelihoods (B5), access for all (B6), exploitation and harassment (B7), equal opportunity (B8), and human rights and decent work (B9) — which carries 14 indicators, more than any other criterion in the standard.
→
Section C — Maximizing benefits for cultural heritage (C1–C3, 9 indicators): The shortest section: presenting cultural heritage (C1), safeguarding and promoting food traditions (C2) and artifacts and symbols (C3).
→
Section D — Maximizing environmental benefits (D1–D13, 93 indicators): The heaviest section by far. Responsible sourcing (D1, ten indicators covering seafood and animal welfare), efficient purchasing (D2), energy (D3), water (D4), GHG emissions (D5), liquid waste including fats, oils and grease (D6), solid and food waste (D7, eleven indicators), hazardous substances (D8), pollution (D9), biodiversity (D10), land and wildlife management (D11), animal health and welfare (D12) and wildlife sourcing (D13).

Source:GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Preamble, Sections A–D

What is Food Safety (A2), and why does the standard call it a baseline?

Because it says so in the criterion itself: A2 asks the organisation to implement effective food safety and operational risk-management practices “as a baseline requirement”, for food quality, guest and employee safety, and operational continuity. Its six indicators: compliance with all applicable local food safety and hygiene regulations; clear allergen information for guests; documented hygiene procedures; those procedures communicated to all relevant employees; food safety and hygiene training at least annually; and, where food safety risks warrant it, scenario-based exercises in that training. ⚠️ Note that “baseline” is the standard’s word for its importance — it does not say A2 is assessed before other criteria or that it sits outside the sustainability criteria. It is a criterion in Section A like the rest.

Source:GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criterion A2

What is the menu criterion (A10)?

Criterion A10 treats the menu as a sustainability communication tool — both format and content. Physical menus should use durable or responsibly sourced materials, or the business provides digital alternatives. Menu content must communicate allergen information, dietary suitability (vegan, vegetarian, plant-based), cultural or belief-sensitive elements, and sustainability-related characteristics of food items. A10 also includes the requirement to reduce reliance on animal-based ingredients — the 30% plant-based threshold.

Source:GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criterion A10 and its Annex: Guidelines

A

Sustainable Management

  • · A1 Management system
  • · A2 Food safety (a baseline requirement)
  • · A3 Legal compliance
  • · A7 Accurate promotion
  • · A9 Sustainable practices and materials
  • · A10 Menu (9 indicators)

11 criteria — the largest section

B

Socioeconomic Benefits

  • · B2 Local employment
  • · B3 Local and inclusive procurement
  • · B4 Supporting local entrepreneurs
  • · B7 Exploitation and harassment
  • · B8 Equal opportunity
  • · B9 Human rights and decent work (14)

B9 is the single largest criterion in the standard

C

Cultural Heritage

  • · C1 Presenting cultural heritage
  • · C2 Safeguarding and promoting food traditions
  • · C3 Artifacts and symbols

Three criteria — the shortest section

D

Environmental Stewardship

  • · D1 Responsible sourcing (10)
  • · D2 Efficient purchasing
  • · D3–D4 Energy and water
  • · D6 Liquid waste, oil and grease
  • · D7 Solid and food waste (11)
  • · D12–D13 Animal welfare and wildlife

13 criteria, 93 indicators — the heaviest section

Cluster 4

The 30% plant-based requirement

The most distinctive feature of GSTC-FB — and the most misunderstood

What does the 30% plant-based requirement actually mean?

Under A10.8, GSTC-FB requires all food businesses to demonstrate a clear commitment to reducing reliance on animal-based ingredients. For standard à la carte and buffet restaurants, this means at least 30% of core food offerings — main dishes or complete meal options — should be plant-based or predominantly plant-based. 'Plant-based' means the dish contains no animal-derived ingredients. 'Predominantly plant-based' means at least 95% plant-derived by weight. Drinks, condiments, garnishes, and minor sides are excluded. This is a percentage of menu offerings, not of dishes sold.

Source:GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Annex: Guidelines for A10, item 8

Does this apply to a restaurant serving a traditional meat-heavy cuisine?

Yes, but the standard accounts for cultural context. For cuisines where meals are traditionally served with a wide range of plant-based side dishes, salads, mezes, grains, or vegetables, the entire meal composition may be considered rather than the main protein alone. A restaurant where every main dish contains meat but is traditionally served with extensive plant-based accompaniments may demonstrate a plant-forward meal balance at the overall guest meal level. The standard also provides for a documented transition pathway — a written plan with milestones and year-on-year evidence of progress toward reducing animal protein per guest meal.

Source:GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Annex: Guidelines for A10, item 8(3)

Does this apply to a steakhouse or specialist protein restaurant?

Yes, as a standard requirement — but with an explicitly provided alternative pathway. A steakhouse cannot immediately achieve 30% plant-based main dishes by definition. The standard provides that where a menu-based threshold cannot reasonably be achieved, the organisation demonstrates a documented transition pathway focused on reducing animal protein use per guest meal over time. This pathway must be credible — it must include specific recipe, purchasing, or portion actions, documented progress, and evidence that the business is genuinely moving in the required direction.

Source:GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Annex: Guidelines for A10, item 8(4)

How is 'plant-based' defined precisely when a dish contains a small amount of dairy or egg?

A dish is 'plant-based' if it contains no animal-derived ingredients. A dish is 'predominantly plant-based' if at least 95% of its ingredients by weight are plant-derived — small amounts of dairy, eggs, or animal fats not exceeding 5% of total ingredient weight and not constituting the primary protein component may be present. Only fully plant-based and predominantly plant-based dishes count toward the 30% threshold.

Source:GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Annex: Guidelines for A10, item 8

Standard pathway — à la carte and buffet

30%

of core food offerings (main dishes or complete meal options) must be plant-based or predominantly plant-based

Alternative pathways where 30% cannot be met directly

Cultural traditions

Entire meal composition assessed — not just main protein. Dishes served with extensive plant-based sides, mezes, or grains may demonstrate plant-forward balance at meal level.

Single-dish / street food

Recipe reformulation — adjust proportions, reduce animal protein per serving, or offer plant-forward variations of core dishes where menu structure limits adjustment.

Documented transition

A written plan showing year-on-year reduction in animal protein per guest meal — through recipe, purchasing, or portion actions — with evidence of implementation and progress.

A credible, implemented transition plan is treated as compliance. A plan that has been written but not implemented will not satisfy the CB.

Cluster 5

Supply chain, sourcing, and FOG management

From farm to fork accountability

What does responsible sourcing require for an F&B business?

Criterion D1 requires a written responsible sourcing policy, annual targets to improve supplier compliance, and purchasing practices that prioritise suppliers with recognised environmental and animal welfare certifications. The criterion names food, beverages, construction materials and consumables, with “particular attention to seafood and animal-welfare considerations”. It also asks for preference to local and small-scale producers using documented sustainable or regenerative practices, unless documented local supply constraints prevent it.

Source:GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criterion D1

What animal welfare requirements apply when sourcing ingredients?

Animal-protein ingredients must be sourced from producers with documented animal welfare practices. Caged and crate systems — battery cages, veal crates, gestation crates, poultry cages — should be avoided where regional alternatives exist, with supplier documentation evidencing alternative practices. Where certified alternatives are not commercially available, this must be formally documented — the attempt to source better must be evidenced.

Source:GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criterion D1, indicators 8 and 9

How does GSTC-FB address seafood?

D1 requires: responsible seafood sourcing prioritising products certified by credible schemes such as MSC or ASC; compliance with applicable fishing bans including seasonal closures and protected species restrictions under CITES and IUCN; evaluating conservation risks of each species used on the menu; and no use of endangered species. For restaurants in coastal destinations with significant local seafood traditions, this requires both supplier documentation and an active process of verifying which species are legally and sustainably available in the specific region.

Source:GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criterion D1, indicators 6 and 7

What is FOG management and what does GSTC-FB require?

FOG — fats, oils, and grease — is the most significant kitchen-specific environmental hazard in food service. Criterion D6 requires:

Grease traps

Commercial grease traps installed in all kitchen facilities and regularly maintained — maintenance records required

Oil storage

Used cooking oil collected and stored to prevent leakage — storage containers and protocols documented

Oil disposal

Disposed through authorised vendors capable of repurposing or recycling — only authorised disposal routes acceptable

Records

Collection and disposal records maintained — with an express carve-out where local authorised vendors do not provide manifest documentation (D6.6)

⚠ These are the D6 items most likely to be missing in practice, and the two that involve somebody else — fitting a trap and finding an authorised oil vendor — cannot be arranged quickly. How any gap would be classified is not ours to say, and there is no certification process to classify it in.

Source:GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criterion D6

Cluster 6

Cultural food heritage

The shortest section — three criteria — and the one about food itself

What does Section C require for a food and beverage business?

⚠️ A cultural-heritage section is not unique to GSTC-FB — every GSTC standard has one. What is distinctive here is its subject: C2 is Safeguarding and Promoting Food Traditions, and the standard’s own preamble puts it as “food is culture, memory, and identity”. It is also the shortest section in the standard, three criteria and nine indicators. C1 (Presenting Cultural Heritage): when cultural elements are used in operations, design, or product development, IP rights must be respected and permissions obtained. C2 (Safeguarding and Promoting Food Traditions): where traditional ingredients, recipes, or techniques are part of the offering, they must be documented, staff must understand their cultural significance, and collaboration with local community members or culinary experts should ensure accurate preservation. C3 (Artifacts and Symbols): cultural artifacts and symbols used in décor or branding must be used respectfully and in compliance with local and international laws.

Source:GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criteria C1–C3

My restaurant serves a traditional regional cuisine. How is Section C assessed?

The CB looks for evidence that the food tradition is presented authentically: documented materials about the cultural origin and context of traditional dishes and techniques; records of staff training in the cultural significance and respectful preparation of those dishes; documentation of engagement with local community members, farmers, or culinary experts; and where applicable, evidence that traditional knowledge is attributed appropriately. A restaurant that has served a traditional regional dish for years with no documentation of its cultural context and no staff training in how to explain it will find Section C difficult.

GSTC publishes no answer to this. TavaSIS’s own reading, based onGSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criterion C2

We serve world cuisines from outside our local culture. What does that require?

When dishes from cultural traditions outside the local context are served, the standard requires cultural sensitivity in representation — accurate dish names, honest descriptions of cultural origins, and avoidance of stereotypes or misrepresentation. Staff should understand the cultural origins of the dishes they serve. The standard does not restrict what cuisines a restaurant may serve — it requires that all cuisines be represented with accuracy and respect for the communities they come from.

GSTC publishes no answer to this. TavaSIS’s own reading, based onGSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criteria C1 and C3

Cluster 7

Evidence

What to produce, and where to start

What evidence does a food and beverage business produce?

→Food safety documents — HACCP plan, allergen records, hygiene procedures, annual food safety training records
→FOG management records — grease trap maintenance logs, cooking oil collection and disposal records
→Management system documents — sustainability policy, targets, annual review report
→Menu documentation — evidence of plant-based proportion, allergen and dietary information, cultural origin of traditional dishes
→Responsible sourcing records — procurement policy, supplier assessments, animal welfare documentation, seafood traceability
→Food and waste management records — waste measurement by stream, food redistribution records
→Energy and water records — consumption monitoring by type, reduction targets and progress
→Cultural heritage documentation — traditional recipe records, staff training, IP permissions
→Community and employment records — local procurement invoices, local employment records

Source:GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criteria A1–A11, B1–B9, C1–C3, D1–D13

What is the minimum set worth having?

Food safety first, because A2 is written as “a baseline requirement” in the criterion itself: compliance with local food safety and hygiene regulations, allergen information for guests, documented hygiene procedures communicated to relevant employees, and food safety training at least annually. Then the D6 items — grease trap maintenance records, used cooking oil collected, stored and disposed of through an authorised vendor, with records. Then a written sustainability policy with documented targets (A1) and a written responsible-sourcing policy (D1). Everything else builds on those.

GSTC publishes no answer to this. TavaSIS’s own reading, based onGSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criteria A2, D6, A1, D1

So what can I actually do, in order?

There is no audit to book, so the sequence is about your own operation rather than about a CB’s calendar:

1.Close the A2 and D6 items, because they are operational rather than documentary — food safety and hygiene compliance, allergen information, documented hygiene procedures, annual training; grease traps maintained, used cooking oil to an authorised vendor with records.
2.Write the two policies the standard keeps returning to: a sustainability policy with documented targets (A1) and a written responsible-sourcing policy with annual supplier targets (D1).
3.Start measuring what you cannot backfill — waste by stream (D7), energy and water (D3, D4), and the plant-based share of your core offerings (A10).
4.Work the remaining criteria as a readiness exercise. That is what our Readiness Check is for, and it costs nothing.

If an F&B scope of accreditation appears later, this is also the order you would have wanted to work in anyway.

GSTC publishes no answer to this. TavaSIS’s own reading, based onGSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criteria A1, A2, D1, D3, D4, D6, D7, A10

How long does the work take?

GSTC publishes no timeline and we will not invent one — and with no audit to prepare for, the only real deadline is your own. What cannot be compressed is anything that turns on a series rather than a document: waste measured by stream, energy and water consumption, annual food safety training that has actually been delivered, supplier targets reviewed over a year. Those take the time they take. The operational items under A2 and D6 — a grease trap, an authorised oil vendor, allergen information — are mostly decisions rather than measurements, and can move quickly.

GSTC publishes no answer to this. TavaSIS’s own reading, based onGSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criteria A2, D6, D7

Where would a food business most often come up short?

⚠No documented hygiene procedures, or none communicated to employees (A2.3, A2.4)
⚠No allergen information for guests (A2.2)
⚠No record of food safety training in the last year (A2.5)
⚠No grease trap, or no maintenance records for the one that is fitted (D6.3)
⚠Used cooking oil leaving informally rather than through an authorised vendor, with no records (D6.5, D6.6)
⚠No written sustainability policy or documented targets (A1.1, A1.2)
⚠Waste not measured by stream (D7)

That is our expectation from the shape of the criteria, not a statistic — no published data on GSTC-FB findings exists, and there is no certification process generating any yet.

GSTC publishes no answer to this. TavaSIS’s own reading, based onGSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criteria A1, A2, D6, D7

Cluster 8

Other credentials, and what happens next

Where GSTC-FB sits against labels you may already hold

What would certification look like if it becomes available?

We can only describe the shape the other industry standards run on, and label it as that rather than as a GSTC-FB answer, because no F&B scope exists to attach it to. For hotels, tour operators, MICE and attractions: a CB accredited for the relevant activity audits by document review, interview and observation; the certification decision is taken by someone who did not carry out the evaluation; the cycle runs three years from that decision with at least one surveillance audit a year; and nonconformities get 90 days to close. Whether any of that would apply to F&B is not something we know, and nor is whether a scope will be added at all.

GSTC publishes no answer to this. TavaSIS’s own reading, based onAccreditation Manual v5.0, Clauses 5.1.1, 8.10.4, 8.10.5, 8.11.4, 8.15.2.1, 8.15.3.1, 8.16.1

I have an organic certification, a green restaurant award, or a sustainability label. Does that count?

Nothing can substitute for GSTC-FB certification, because there is no GSTC-FB certification — so the question is really what your existing credential is worth as evidence, and the answer is: quite a lot in specific places. An organic certification speaks to D1 responsible sourcing. A waste or energy programme speaks to D7, D3 and D4. Food safety accreditation speaks directly to A2.

On GSTC-Recognized status, which is often misunderstood: it applies to a standard, not to a certification, and means GSTC has reviewed that standard and found it equivalent to its own. In GSTC’s words, Recognition “does not relate to the process of certification, nor to accreditation” and “does not ensure that the certification process is reliable”. Check the current list rather than relying on this page.

Source:GSTC — Certification, Accreditation, Recognition·GSTC-Recognized Standards·GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Criteria A2, D1, D3, D4, D7

How does GSTC-FB relate to the other GSTC standards?

It shares their four-pillar structure and much of their vocabulary, so work done for one carries across. The closest overlaps: a hotel’s GSTC-H A14 Food and Beverages and its A13 Procurement; a tour operator’s A8 Procurement, which bars endangered species from food and beverage offerings and prefers community-owned suppliers for meals; and a destination’s A4, which requires it to promote certification among its enterprises. If you already work to one of those standards, GSTC-FB is the detailed version of the part of it that happens in your kitchen.

GSTC publishes no answer to this. TavaSIS’s own reading, based onGSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Preamble·GSTC Standards Overview

Does GSTC-FB apply to food trucks and very small operations?

The standard clearly contemplates them: its menu guidance gives street food vendors and very small operations their own compliance route, and its Standard Application clause acknowledges that for micro and community-owned businesses “limited resources may prevent the comprehensive application of all criteria”, with non-applicability to be justified. What it does not do is spell out how a mobile unit satisfies a fitted grease trap — D6.3 is written as installing and maintaining commercial grease traps in kitchen facilities, and the standard leaves the mobile case to the justification route rather than addressing it. Note also that D6.6 already carves out records “where local authorized vendors do not provide manifest documentation”, which is the nearest thing to an allowance for informal local infrastructure.

Source:GSTC Food & Beverage Standard v1.0, Standard Application, Annex: Guidelines for A10, Criterion D6

Food & Beverage — get started

Readiness Check — all 215 performance indicators

Since there is no certification to pursue yet, knowing where you stand is the useful thing to do. Work through the complete GSTC Food & Beverage Standard checklist, free, with each indicator you submit observed — and have the record ready if an F&B scope of accreditation is added later.

It runs in a TavaSIS workspace. Create your account and choose your password, and the workspace opens as soon as you sign up.

Start your Readiness Check →